Still life of gun shot shells on reflective black background

The Real Enemy of the Environment is Bad Product Design

Every day I walk my dog and every day I pick up garbage that has mysteriously never made it to the garbage or recycling bin. It pains me to see what humans so mindlessly pitch waste out their car windows or drop by the side of the road. Every day I think humans are disgusting and lazy and they deserve to die out.

On better days I think, not ALL humans are horrible. Some are trying to change the way things are done. It’s just easier to see the actions of the nasty ones then it is to see the ones that are doing good.

Over the Holidays I had the pleasure of reading a fascinating book called The Upcycle, by William McDonough and Michael Braungart. This is the follow up book to their first collaboration, Cradle to Cradle.

Each book outlines their drive for a new way to design for the planet. Designing for Cradle to Cradle or C2C “means that a material or its component chemicals could be reused endlessly, safely.” It is the opposite of our current way of thinking where everything can just be thrown away. To a certain extent it encourages recycling, but smart recycling. It means making products with the whole product cycle in mind. Not just its first purpose, but the second and maybe the third until it breaks down into smaller particles and starts all over again.

Composting is nature’s C2C. Food grows from the soil, we consume what we need, the leftover bits are then allowed to decompose and eventually nourish the next generation of food. Bill and Michael argue in their books that when designing a product or service, companies must think about the bigger picture, not just the immediate gain. The question should always be — what’s next and where are we going with this?

This book was brought to mind recently with the huge press coverage of Terracycle’s new initiative called Loop — a program of ordering products online in reusable packaging that can be returned to the manufacturer — aka, the Milkman. It was introduced at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Terracycle “is an innovative recycling company that has become a global leader in recycling hard-to-recycle waste.”(1) They have worked with some of the largest companies, encouraging them to change their packaging to include recycled materials.

However, the recycling business is not going well. Overall, about 91% of all the plastic waste ever created has never been recycled — a statistic so “concerning,” the Royal Statistical Society named it the 2018 international statistic of the year. (2) The Chinese have drastically reduced the amount of recycled materials they import from the west and this has left recycling companies struggling to figure out what to do with all their collected waste. This brings to mind what people like Annie Leonard of “The Story of Stuff” have been saying for years; that recycling is not the answer to our waste problem.

Recycling alone will never stem the flow of plastics into our oceans; we have to get to the source of the problem and slow down the production of all this plastic waste. Think about it. If your home was flooding because you had left the faucet on, your first step wouldn’t be to start mopping. You’d first cut the flooding off at its source — the faucet. In many ways, our plastics problem is no different. (3)

We are consumers of products who love the convenience of going to the store and bringing home things in easy to carry packages. But, as Leonard says, “not long ago, we existed in a world without throwaway plastic, and we can thrive that way again.”(4) Which makes the Terracycle program so interesting. Bring back the Milkman, modern style, by ordering online and having UPS pick up the reusable packaging in reusable boxes. It seems like it might fit the C2C mentality of looking at the full cycle of a product’s life. Except in this case it only addresses one aspect of the product, the package, It does not address the contents, and it hints at a bit of green washing.

The companies that Terracycle has brought into this experiment are the ones that can afford it; Coke, Nestle, Unilever among others. All of these companies currently face serious backlash for being the biggest contributors of plastic waste. They are in fact on Greenpeace’s Top 10 of the Worst Plastic Polluters.(5) The Break Free from Plastic (#breakfreefromplastic) movement was created to shame these producers of plastic by posting images in social media of trash with their logos lining the streets and waterways.

And it’s working. These companies know they need some good press and perhaps they think the Terracycle program is how they can get it. But as consumers, we need to look at the bigger picture. What exactly are these companies producing? What chemicals go into the production of antiperspirant, Coke, and Clorox disinfecting wipes? How are they produced?

A product is more than just its package. It’s also what happens to the contents when they wash down the drain or get thrown away. Some antiperspirant contains known carcinogens that have been banned in Europe, the chemical make up of coke has been well documented, and Clorox wipes are not biodegradable. In addition, the CEO of Nestle has stated that he does not believe that access to water is a human right and so Nestle continues to drain essential aquifers for profit.

One of the mantra’s of the Break Free From Plastic movement has been its high time we put the responsibility for pollution back on the manufacturers. Changes in how they produce products will have a much higher impact on the environment than me carrying my own shopping bag or coffee mug. How we as consumers can make a difference is by not buying their products. By showing them over and over that not only do we want better packaging but we want better and safer products that don’t harm us or pollute the planet at every stage of production. So while I applaud Terracycle’s program, I will never participate because I don’t shop from any of those companies. On the other hand, I know I am a niche consumer, one who buys organic, doesn’t mind seeking out independent grocers who sell in bulk and who buys or makes only all natural cleaning products. Most people don’t care.

The challenge for Terracycle’s Loop program will be to get those consumers who do currently buy those products to take the time to order a few products online and organize shipping of the containers back to the manufacturer. To become “niche” as it were. But if it succeeds perhaps it will set the stage for new developments more in line with C2C.

The advantage of a C2C mentality is that, when applied across the economy, no one has to be niche. No one has to be inconvenienced or go out of their way to protect the planet. The system and the products it creates would already be doing that. There would be no waste to manage because everything is produced in a way that can be reused or repurposed continuously. This utopia may seem overly optimistic to some but the model works and the book describes ways that the authors have helped companies change how they think and work in order to create new and exciting systems and products. And while the cynic reading this might think it could never be profitable, the authors’ experience has been just the opposite. They found that as each company seeks out new ways of doing things, there is a ripple effect that stretches out to their suppliers and competition. To quote the book,

And this gives me hope because I know that until we are truly faced with a catastrophic, in your face, environmental crisis, people are more likely to respond to things that are simple and make them feel good. It is much harder and takes more thought to be an advocate for the environment. I know I will continue to curse the trash I pick up every day but it is good to know that people are making a difference somewhere. Humans are essentially innovators, we are constantly seeking out new ideas, new ways to solve problems. The Cradle to Cradle philosophy encourages us to solve our current problems with more thoughtful design that supports us and the planet. It’s not easy but no one ever said it would be. And frankly, at this point, what choice do we have?

To learn more about the book click here.

To read more about the C2C certification and institution click here

Further reading about Loop

Plastic Bags

Carrying Your Own Bag IS Better

I admit to being a die-hard fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Joss Whedon’s writing in that tv series was superb and memorable. Which is why when I thought of this post, the quote “Fire bad, tree pretty” came to mind. At the time Buffy and her friends had just defeated the evil principal of their high school in an epic battle after he had transformed into a gigantic snake bent on turning the world into his personal hell. Looking out over the high school as it was engulfed in flames and the snake lay dead on the lawn, Buffy was asked how she was doing. Exhausted, she replied, “fire bad, tree pretty”.

I may not have defeated a massive snake but sometimes the battle to protect the environment can be exhausting.

There are so many elements to the problems with the environment that it can be overwhelming. Sometimes it helps to start with something simple.

Plastic bags BAD, carry your own bags GOOD.

I have been carrying my own shopping bags for over 15 years. It started when my husband and I lived in an apartment. Each time we got a plastic bag from shopping I would put it in a bigger bag until we could find a use for it. Eventually, I had two big garbage bags full of smaller plastic bags. We just weren’t using them fast enough. I had no place to put all these bags. I heard you could take them to thrift stores and they would reuse them for their products but it wasn’t really sanctioned or promoted. Recycling of bags at the time was unheard of. I hated the idea of throwing them out.

So, to stop the tide, I started carrying my own bags. At least I wouldn’t be acquiring any more plastic bags. I was a bit of a pioneer in this. No one else I knew was doing it. I started giving away nylon shopping bags as gifts hoping others would stop acquiring bags that were destined for the landfill.

You would have to live in a cave these days to not know that the world is inundated with plastic. There is so much plastic waste that we have islands of it floating in the oceans. Drive down any highway, any stretch of road and you will see garbage caught in the trees and bushes. It’s disgusting, right? Obviously, we need to stop acquiring plastic bags that end up floating off in the wind and polluting the world around us. 

Recently, I found a great post from Bright Vibes that supports this belief. The article describes 8 ways you can quit plastic today. Carrying a reusable bag is one of the steps. But then my research journey took me to a Canadian site called All About Bags and I had to stop and reassess. Not because I was wrong all these years but that I was missing some keys facts.

All About Bags is a site put out by the Canadian Plastics industry Association as a “resource tool for the debate about bags”. Through various posts, they set about debunking a lot of the myths surrounding plastic bags. For example, plastic bags makeup only 0.8% of the litter stream – at least in Toronto, and less that 1% of the waste stream – what ends up in landfills.

Some other interesting tidbits:

  • In Canada, plastic bags are made from Ethane, a byproduct and the natural gas production line. Durable paper bags are made from virgin forests and take large amounts of energy to produce, not to mention the cutting down of trees.
  • In North America, plastic bags are made locally, 90% in Canada and around 75% in the US
  • Canada has a high rate of recycling plastic bags, over 30% across the country. Which, for recycling, is actually high. Many of these bags are turned into furniture, boardwalks and water pipes.

The essential argument of the site is that plastic bags are in fact better than carry your own bags because they are not only reusable for a multitude of things including garbage and compost waste but that they can now be recycled. Carry Your Own bags are often made from non-recyclable materials to make them strong enough for more items and to last longer.

However, there are MANY types of reusable bags. We had some cotton bags that lasted years. We also purchased some grocery bins from a local chain that not only carry more groceries at a time, but they are great for keeping your lemons from rolling around in the back of the car. When I go to the local market for vegetables, I take a handmade willow basket that a friend made.

While I concede that plastic bags are good because they can be reused for wet and dirty objects,  I am reluctant still to say they are “better” than carrying your own reusable bags.

So to recap, plastic bags NOT TOTALLY HORRIBLE in areas where they are put to good re-use and recycled appropriately but carry your own bags are BETTER when they are made from durable and or organic materials.

I would love to see more stores selling reusable bags made out of hemp, the miracle fibre that is even better for the environment than organic cotton. In addition, let’s figure out how to make a plastic bag substitute that is totally biodegradable.